Highlights

Supreme Court directs states to submit reports
Need to ‘find out the truth’ of alleged attacks on Christian institutions
Incident claims need to be verified

New Delhi. The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Government to summon reports from states like Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Karnataka, Odisha, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand, expressing the need to “find out the truth” of the alleged attacks on Christian institutions. Instructed the Ministry of Home Affairs. The top court said that an attack on an individual does not mean that it is an attack on the community, but if even only 10 per cent of the claims made in the PIL are true, it needs to be probed.

This direction of the court has come on the plea of ​​Dr. Peter Macedo of ‘National Solidarity Forum’ and Vijayesh Lal of Evangelical Fellowship of India and others. The central government told the court that the public interest litigation based on the ‘willingness’ report should not be heard. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice Hima Kohli said, “Although an attack on an individual does not mean that it is an attack on the community, we still need to find out the truth.” We need to verify the claims of any such incident made through Public Interest Litigation (PIL).

In the cases mentioned in the PIL, 162 cases were found to be wrong after verification.

Disagreeing with the court’s stand, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Central Government, argued that 162 of the cases mentioned in the PIL were found to be incorrect after verification. On the Centre’s contention, the bench said, “This is a PIL and we initially assume that the claim made is justified.” Senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for the petitioners, submitted that most of the attacks on members of the Christian community have followed the same pattern and these attacks are being carried out in connivance with the police officers. Gonsalves argued that in most cases Christian clergy are prosecuted by the police, while the attackers are given freedom to roam freely.

Tags: central government, Supreme Court

,



Source link

Previous articleTelangana: On son’s death anniversary, a man distributed petrol to customers for free, there was a jam on the highway
Next articleAsia Cup: Sri Lanka won in the last over, made it to Super-4, Bangladesh was out

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here