Highlights

The top court said – had the management accepted the decision, it would not have had to wait 10 years
The High Court had directed to restore in May 2011

New Delhi. The Supreme Court, while ruling in favor of the sacked watchman nearly two decades ago, has ordered his reinstatement. The watchman was dismissed from his job in December 2002. Ordered it on Friday. The top court said that the management should not have made “ruthless efforts” to harass him.

The court noted that the labor court had in August 2010 held the dismissal of JK Jadeja illegal and directed the Kutch district panchayat to reinstate him with continuation of service without previous pay. Justice U U Lalit and Justice S R Bhat set aside the order of a division bench of the Gujarat High Court setting aside the direction to reinstate him and ordering him to pay a compensation of about Rs one lakh. was.

The High Court had directed to restore in May 2011
The bench noted that the management had challenged the labor court’s decision, but a single judge bench of the high court in May 2011 upheld its decision and directed reinstatement of the person. Later, the management filed an appeal, which was dismissed and thereafter moved the apex court.

The top court said – had the management accepted the decision, it would not have had to wait 10 years
The Supreme Court said- ‘If the management had accepted the decision, the plaintiff would not have to wait for 10 years’. And the instructions of labor court and single judge should be implemented to maintain continuity of service.

It is noteworthy that Jadeja was appointed as a watchman by the respondent society on October 5, 1992 and was posted as a watchman at Shirai Dam in Beraja village of Gujarat.

Tags: Gujarat news, New Delhi news, Supreme Court

,



Source link

Previous articleIND vs AUS: Rohit Sharma’s blast in Nagpur, became the only player in Team India’s victory
Next articleCongress used the actor’s picture without taking permission, Akhil Iyer said – I will take legal action

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here